Critical Discourse Analysis Essay -- Social Discourse

Critical Discourse AnalysisJan blommaert and Chris Bulcaen makes a brief introduction to the study of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). CDA intends to expenditure social-theoretical method in intervention analysis and is primarily linguistically found (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.447). It intends to analyze the structural relationships of dominance, discrimination, power and control through a text editionual study (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.448). Based on the assumption that social discourse is constructed and socially conditioned, CDA explores the power dynamics in this process.According to Fairclough, CDA analysis can be divided into three-dimensions first, discours-as-text which analyzes the textual linguistic elements as concrete instances of discourse hour, discourse-as-discursive-practice, specially focusing on discourse processes like speech act, coherence and intertexuality threesome, discourse-as-social-practice which examines the effectuate and the hegemonic proc ess in the discourse (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.448-9). While both the second and the troika dimension consider the arrangement of text elements or quotes as intertexuality, the second dimension makes the interaction between text and context visible and the third dimension makes the discursive power dynamic visible as well. Moreover, they rase out that CDA aims to undertake a social responsibility to correct peculiar(a) discourses for change, empowerment, and practice-orientedness (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.449). Because of this, CDA pay large attention to social topics and works on both main directions power and ideology, and change of the structuralist determinism (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.452). Although it ambitiously put such smashing emphasis on social phenomena o... ...te in the 1960s which reflected two opposite public opinions on Television and radio respectively. More current usage could be the different experience of a same news text people read on a mainstr eam newspaper and on a facebook sharing page. As Blommaert and Bulcaen suggest the incorporation of linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions, this could be taken into consideration in further studies. ReferenceBlommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. AnnualReview of Anthropology,29, 447-66.Schroder, K.C. (2007). Media discourse analysis researching cultural meaning from opening to reception. Texual Cultures Texts, Contexts, Interpretation 2, 2, 77-99.Steensland, B. (2008). Why do policy frames change? actor-ideacoevolution in debates on welfare reform. Social Forces, 86(3), 1027-54.