'Of Mice and Men Compare and Contrast\r'

'The disc, Of Mice and custody by John Steinbeck, is about devil workforce named George and Lennie who ar vitality in the time of the Great Depression. They travel unneurotic and after they get themselves into trouble in the city of Weed, they moved to work on a ranch. There is all oerly a motion-picture show, â€Å"Of Mice and Men,” that is based off of the word of honor. There are m some(prenominal) nationals in the story, one of them cosmos super agent. The photo differs slightly from the make in the fact that it has fewer examples masking the brilliance of personnel, un want the book where in that respect are many instances of military group.\r\nFirst off, situation is sh induce, or in some instances not sh accept, in the characters. In some(prenominal) the book and the movie, George has a reliable cause over Lennie. He acts as his father: reprimanding him, protecting him, and carnal knowledge him what to do for his own good like a normal father w ould mystify. A second character that supports the theme of power in the book and movie is Lennie. Although he doesn’t have a circuit of tenacious power, he is a really forciblely powerful person in the movie and book. He’s tall, conceptive built, and just all around a big guy that can do a tremendous amount of somatogenetic labor.\r\nAnother similarity between the book and movie relating to power is crisp, the boss’s son. He’s a very(prenominal) small man that likes to order mickle around and has the reputation of beating up bigger guys. Even though in that respect are multiple examples of characters viewing power in both the book and movie, there is an example of when the movie makes the theme less(prenominal) relevant to the story. In the book, Lennie has the power to intend to go to the sweep, where George told him to go if he got into any trouble. But, in the movie, it was so that Lennie was lost and couldn’t find the brush.\r\n It made Lennie seem more(prenominal) unguarded and with less logical power than in the book where he proven himself, aside from his challenges. The second subject that the theme is shown in is results. The events are both alike(predicate) and different within the book and movie. In both the book and movie, George talks for Lennie in front of the boss when they first induce at the ranch. He’s overturned that Lennie will say something to reveal that he isn’t the smartest person and that it might continue them from working there. A similarity is also the fact that when George and Lennie were ran out of\r\nWeed, they were being dog for no reason other than the article of the girl that Lennie accidentally scared. He had no intension of hurting her and never did, only she lull had the power to manipulate everyone to hark back that she was assaulted by Him. The last similarity of events that ornament power is when Lennie accidentally kills the mice, the puppy, an d nappy’s wife. He had so a good deal physical power and didn’t know his own strength that he would kill living things before even realizing what was happening. This got him into a pickle of trouble eventually.\r\nA significant deviation in events that proves the importance power is that in the book, Curly’s wife who was sooner looked at as a feeble, vulnerable woman with no power over anyone, all of a sudden exhibit a great deal of trust over one of the black workers, Crooks. This was a very sudden turnaround in authority and changed the reader’s idea about her. This happening never occurred in the movie and tremendously changed the outlook of power from the book. The last topic that displays the value of power is the stages of the story.\r\nThe first thing is that in both the movie and book Curly’s wife does not have a name. This may have been to connote that her name had little importance or power over the story. Her tinct of get Len nie killed from him accidentally killing her had nothing to do with her name. Another detail is that the stable steward was African-American. This shows a lack of power in the movie and book because he was laboured to live by himself and had no impact on the decisions or thoughts of the other men simply because of his race.\r\nA third detail is that George was much smaller than Lennie in both portrayals of the story, yet he had power over Lennie as if he was his father. This shows that even though one may be very powerful in a certain way like Lennie, they can still be controlled by someone that possibly had more confidence. all in all in all, the movie weighs the importance of power to some fulfilment less than the book does. Both the book and movie’s characters are in general the same, except the book shows Lennie with more logical power than the movie does for when Lennie runs back to the brush to meet George.\r\nThe events are very much alike also. But, the movie is lacking the event of Curly’s wife showing power over Crooks in his own cabin, which dramatically impacts the atmosphere of the story. The book and movie also have similar elaborate showing power like Curly’s wife not having a name, Crooks not having a lot of power because of his race, and little George having power over Lennie. All these subjects help communicate how the movie and book relate to each other for showing power.\r\n'