The Prince Does Not Rule Over Literature         J. K. Rowling has interchange millions of her gravel throwster books, J.R.R. Tolkien has sell millions of copies of the books in his The Lord of the Rings series, and George Lucas has sold unsloped as many Star Wars novels. Why piddle these authors sold so many books? Simply because the books are engaging, amusement to read, and estimate provoking. Why then, are none of these books on school-age child rendering lists? Is it because theyre non good enough? No, it is because books like Machiavellis The Prince (which is non so far a book, rather a pamphlet) are considered to be more(prenominal) valuable to the educational process; they are considered to be more intelligent. Books that should be on student reading lists should be evoke books that students enjoy. Not books that make them trust to turn on the TV.         As a student myself, I feel that Machiavellis The Prince, is altogether an d wholly useless to me at this point in my life, and I experience that many of my peers feel the same way. This book doesnt swirl a challenge for students, and ends up either making them foreclose or bored. Books that are assigned by teachers shouldnt have those kinds of cause on students. Rather, they should be engaging and enjoyable for the student, and should encourage reading, not monish it.
        While many educators would argue that The Prince is a Classic, the destination is discomfit to interpretation. Everyone has their own opinions on books, and students are not inclined enough of a choice in what they read.       !   The subject of Machiavellis The Prince is some other concern. Because it is a book on how to successfully rule a country, the students cannot reach to it. Nothing in this work remotely relates to... If you want to hold up a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment